Sunday, October 13, 2013

It does not become a threat, until it becomes a threat. Will it be then too late for you?


Whether you are talking about innovation, women and minority presence on boards, or any kind of other non-standard corporate practices, everyone has a saying. And so do I.

Reviewing all the fuzz that Vivek Wadhwa has created at calling Silicon Valley “all boys tech club”. I could only roll my eyes. (link) Mr. Wadhwa stated a fact: start-ups in Silicon Valley are mainly directed by white male individuals. He argues that, for any company to evolve and last as a business, this kind of male dominated culture is not the best option. Several analyses show that companies that have inclusive boards do better than companies that do not. Many people say that the correlation shown in those analyses does not imply causation and should be ignored.

Let us take a look at other examples of such analyses companies are confronted to: “companies that invest in innovation and take it seriously do better than companies that do not”, or “companies that do environmentally ethical business do better than companies that do not”. Now, is there causation in the correlation shown on the studies that support those statements or should we simply ignore those too?

My take on this is quite pragmatic. Success, from the business perspective, is always relative. The goal of any given company is to do financially better than its competitors. If everyone in a given market is doing exactly the same, there is no way to become better than your neighbour. However, as soon as one company in that ecosystem has the courage to do something different, it sets itself to bring a positive change that can generate competitive advantage.
Companies, like people, do not like change, so they tend to openly disregard the signs that show them that if they do not act differently they might lose their market position. Ignorance is not bliss, but danger.

For those people that still feel sceptical about linking correlation and causality when dealing with business decisions, I will simply tell them that, as the adage goes, the proof of the pudding is in the eating!  If a company operates and manages its talent exactly as it did in the old days, I cannot believe it is future proof.

As for the investors in Silicon Valley that seem to support the same success formula over and over. I would only tell them: enjoy as long as you can, because when your competition will see the potential of supporting a different model, you will be doomed. And those new models will include men, women, children, elderly, minorities, environment, ethics, etc. -the most diverse human side. At the end of the day, we are humans and businesses are here to deliver needs to humans of all kinds and sustain our evolution, not more and not less. In my humble opinion by forgetting all that is how we end up with a 1929 crisis, a .com crisis, a general banking crisis, and any other that will come along. There will be more because we are humans and we do not like change… Will it be then too late for you?